Monday, December 20, 2010
Partners of the Interior, rights and responsibilities
Like abortion, marriage gay is a highly divisive issue in America. For this reason, some States have adopted laws provide a compromise that homosexuals have some or all rights and benefits of marriage, but not considered legal marriages. California solution was to implement partner California Interior rights and obligations (Act) Act. Warning: the information in this article applies only to the law of California. Partner within laws in other countries may vary. Background prior adoption rights within partner California and the law on responsibility, California, had begun to grant homosexual rights. West Hollywood has established a register of the national partnership for same-sex couples in 1985. 1999, Governor Gray Davis signed legislation (AB 26), the staff who gave Government, the law to register their national partnerships, partners within and visits the hospital partner insurance cover. In 2001 domestic partners in California 18 rights.EnactmentThe additional republication rights within California and act on tasks, which took effect on 1 January 2005 have won partner still extended Californian law on same-sex relationships. This provided important legislation that homosexuals should be treated in essentially the same as opposite sex marriages, except that these relationships describe themselves would require "Marriages" and different methods for their creation and dissolution. Furthermore, certain taxes State discusses questions differently by law.Domestic RequirementsIn partnership same-sex couples for a p registrierenim Interior agenda for California, the partners must meet the five requirements: first, must share a House. Second place or person kabe married NN to someone else. Third place, or related to another. Fourthly, both individuals must be at least 18 years. And finally this pair file must be a statement of the national partnership with the Secretary of the California filed by State.Legal ChallengesTwo prosecutions were for breaking the California domestic partner rights and obligations. One of these argued that the law passed incorrectly modified proposal 22, a ballot initiative changed California State law to explain that only marriage between a man and a woman was invalid in 2000. Two lawsuits courts.Proposition State lost ultimately 8In 2008 proposal (8) a state ballot initiative to amend the California Constitution passed a statement containing the legal recognition of same-sex marriage ban. The proposal explains that only marriage between a man and a woman was valid in California, but it was still on domestic partnerships. California Supreme Court has interpreted the change means that it applied only to marriage not to register licenses and partners inside. Therefore proposed 8A be repealed or amended rights responsibilities Act.BenefitsRegistered in California and households partner partners have married many of the same rights as in California. For example, you can make health care decisions for your partner have the same rights as married partner community asset and may be named so that restaurants on the property and the well-being of their partners.
Labels:
[:]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment